Not So Short Fiction Review: The River of Shadows
The River of Shadows (Book III of the Chathrand Voyage Series)
Robert V.S. Redick
Del Ray (592 pages,$16.00, April 2011)
Reviewed by David Soyka
My purpose here is simply a warning. If you are part of that infinitesimally small [and ever smaller] band of dissidents with the wealth, time and inclination to set your hands on the printed word, I suggest you consider the arguments against the current volume. To wit: the tale is morbid, the persons depicted are clumsy when they are not evil, the world is inconvenient to visit and quite changed from what is here described, the plot at this early juncture is already complex beyond all reason, the moral cannot be stated, and the editor is intrusive. The story most obviously imperils the young.
p. 107-108
There are various reasons for such “editorial” intrusions into a narrative rolling along quite nicely seemingly without need for meta-fictional comment. One is in fact to be meta-fictional, to purposely draw attention to the illusion of storytelling. But, another, opposite tact, is to give the text the illusion of legitimacy, that what we’re reading, however improbable, is an actual historical document. The latter is the approach of the modern über-fantasy, Lord of the Rings, in which the tale is presented as an ancient manuscript edited for a contemporary audience by a medieval scholar.
Given that this was J.R.R. Tolkien’s day-job, this might have been intended as a kind of inside joke, albeit from a guy who wasn’t particularly jokey. In the case of Robert V.S. Redick, whose The River of Shadows, the penultimate volume in the Chathrand Voyage Series, is a sort of Tolkien at sea, he pointedly wants us to be in on the joke.
There are a lot of “paint by the numbers” Tolkien clones for the simple reason that there is a market for people who want more of the same. They’ll probably enjoy this series. But while Redick may be guilty of a little too slavish attention to both fantasy cliché and Perils of Pauline dilemmas resolved by convenient magical cavalry to the rescue, it’s all in good fun. Not the sort of fun that’s saying, “Ew, how stupid all this heroic questing stuff is.” Rather, it’s the sort of fun that’s saying, well, isn’t this all great fun?
Which, it is.
The Wall Street Journal weighs in on the
No doubt somewhere someone is writing a vampire series based on Hamlet (there is, alas, a
The second is Cherie Priest’s kickoff of an “urban fantasy” (a term which I take to mean “vampires who live and suck blood in cities”) called
I’ve sometimes bought a book without knowing anything about it because it had a cool cover. Similarly, I’ve been drawn to read a story because of a cool title.
I first read Joanna Russ as an assignment for a graduate seminar in science fiction. The story was “

The 19th online issue — and 26th issue overall – of one of the genre’s leading publications, Subterranean Magazine, is now available (at least in part).
In addition to having the coolest title for a genre fiction magazine, 
The April edition of 