How Billy Graham’s Conan Art Got Him Fired from Fantastic Magazine
Fantastic magazine, edited by Ted White. August 1972. Cover by Jeff Jones
I read Rich Horton’s Retro Review of the August 1972 issue of Fantastic magazine here at Black Gate, and I remember being excited by what I presumed was the first appearance of Conan in Fantastic, and then realizing just how awful the novelette was, which was made even more disappointing by the fact that this cover was the first time the great Jeff Jones, already known for terrific depictions of Howard’s Solomon Kane, tackled Conan.
Even in 1968, when I read Conan the Adventurer at the age of ten, I noticed that all the best Conan stories were by Howard, but it took me into my early teens to realize just how bad the non-Howard ones were. Yes, De Camp was a much better writer than Carter, but his work lacked the passion and pulp poetry necessary for the character, and something like “Beyond the Black River” (which my penpal Fritz Leiber thought was the best Conan story, along with “People of the Black Circle,” which Fritz liked for its sympathetic villain and capable proto-Indian heroine), was completely outside De Camp’s wheelhouse.
Billy Graham’s illustration for “Black Sphinx of Nebthu” (Fantastic, July 1973)
I recall reading that, when De Camp was putting together the Gnome Press collections in the 1950s, he originally approached Leigh Brackett about doing new Conan stories. Those might have actually been good.
But the Fantastic novelettes, which went into a fix-up novel about Conan and Conn, were the worst. Teenaged me had no interest in King Conan as a middle-aged dad being a good father figure to his son, rather than a brawling wenching skull-splitting mercenary/thief badass.
Table of Contents for the August 1972 Fantastic
Billy Graham’s illustration for the sequel to this novelette got him “fired” by White. In the letter column, White apologized for this illo, called it a “gross caricature,” and said that, as all of Graham’s work had been disappointing, he would not be appearing in the magazine again.
Graham, the first prominent Black comics artist of the 70s, would later do important work on Luke Cage and Black Panther, and I’d liked his earlier work for Creepy, but his Fantastic illustrations were not his finest hour. For this one, he’d recycled a fanzine caricature from several years before.
Billy Graham, and his covers for Marvel’s Luke Cage, Hero For Hire (Issue 15,
November 1973) and Jungle Action, Featuring The Black Panther (Issue 21, 1976)
Graham’s Black Panther storyline, with T’Challa fighting the Klan in Georgia, ended with the cliffhanger on the cover of issue 21 (see above). Marvel gave the book to Kirby, who started a completely unrelated story. I was so mad as a teenager.
They did complete the story arc twenty or thirty years later, with the Black writer Christopher Priest (Jim Owlsey, no relation to the British SF writer), but Billy Graham had passed away by then.
White employed several artists later important to Marvel and DC. Dave Cockrum would draw the X-Men revival that was a huge hit, and which added Wolverine to the team, along with Storm, Colossus, and Cockrum’s creation Nightcrawler.
But easily the best was Michael Kaluta, who would soon be doing gorgeous work for DC on The Shadow and Burroughs’ Carson of Venus.
I can only imagine how little Fantastic paid these artists.
No one reveres Kirby more than I do, but the Black Panther was the nadir of his post-DC, “Return to Marvel” work. He obviously had no interest in the book and was only working on it because he had to.
Regarding comic artists illustrating SF magazines in the 70s, I believe that Joe Staton also illustrated stories in Amazing and Fantastic, and Wendi Pini did art for Galaxy / If.
Marvel was in a difficult position when Jack Kirby returned to the publisher in the mid-70s. He increasingly needed firm editorial guidance as his stories became more crazy but he was often his own editor (as well as writer and penciller, sometimes also inker). On the other hand, it would have been hard for an editor to stand up to King Kirby and say, “Jack, that’s not a good direction for this character”. I imagine that ultimately however, even Kirby couldn’t deny the declining sales.
That’s certainly true, but you can really see the difference between the work he cared about, work with his new characters – 2001, The Eternals – and the work (mostly with his older characters like Black Panther and Captain America) that he was doing just as a “job.” One is alive, whatever its flaws, and the other is just dead.
Personally I LOVE Kirby’s “Crazy” works – it’s what got me into being a lifelong comics fans – all the piles of black X on cover super well read comics I got dirt cheap because it was the late Bronze Age/Copper Age – rather in the Copper pre Mylar (Direct market boom of the 1980s but not 90s Comic bubble) age these were trashy old comics so kids could get dozens of comics to read vs ONE comic for the same $.
My favs were OMAC and Kammadi. Also saw some Sandman and Morlock… Eternals too.
I like that drawing! Being master of the obvious he’s trying to play on how hyper macho Conan is. But he’s amateurish – the good kind where he’s learning. Frazetta did this angle in “Chained” used first as the cover for Conan the Usurper. Fraz gave an alt title to it; “Is that a SNAKE in your loincloth or are you happy to see me?” Sure some saw Conan as over the top, but part of Professionalism is you’d do something for someone for $ even if you’d not do it casually on your own. How’d you treat a chef at a restaurant who refused to make a wedding cake with two grooms or two brides on top as if that was just small plastic things on top… So if an artist is a “Pro” they should try to do anything the customer asks vs worrying it might hurt their “Feelz”, not be what they’d do for fun or their ‘hipster’ friends might hate on them if its a sexy lady not that the latter could give them a DIME to save their lives. IRL I’ve seen 15 page lists of “Won’t Do” and like “No Brown M&M” contracts rockstars legit need there are surprises like “NO amputees in ANY context” – but they want to do TTRPG work…? What if the employer gets to a module involving Pirates later after hiring and trusting them for a few modules? Frazetta could joke on it – though he was VERY professional – but when he joked he got away with it due to a nickname “God” because of his top of the game skill and output.
I like this guy’s early Amateur style and type this suggesting for the modern world it might be a sane counter for “AiArt” or rather a form of adaptation versus pointless crying and trying for legislation that they’ll lose even if they win. All these artists screaming “Halp me! Aiart turk mur jurrb!” would probably refuse to do something like a Midjourney painting because they could NOT do it and most avoid any backgrounds save when a sucker (client) is willing to pay then they get stock art and put it through a painter filter. Those that can do high quality figures are usually reliant on all the high end software tools – lines corrected, textures to lines, 3d figures just beneath the surface to trace over… And for all of that you get a rather DRY style. Just as the authors complaining AIWriting tend to (if published) write bland, generic stuff and often use Ghostwriters aka pre computer AiWriting trying to output as much as possible till the crushing weight of text submitted gets the publisher to cry for mercy and pay them…
Thus perhaps we should have a return of underground and lowbrow styles and stories…? Serious, look up Underground Comix, Bode, Larry Todd, Crumb, Shelton. They don’t have to be perfect at anatomy as long as they can reliably do pics that are good to look at. BUT they also have to do eye to paper. Original work has to be INK on paper. They can colorize it with the computer, but again has to be drawn for start. Eye to hand not trace crudely and fill in digitally. They can use models but have to look at them then draw them. BUT they can be Underground Comix bonkers! And since the target audience is adults print BOOBS and S-x situations. The commercial AI has filters that block – likewise for writing. Put in tons of nasty stories that the ChatGPT would go “You had the hero see sex workers as entertainment before the adventure, you should point out it’s exploitation. You then described the African natives attacking him as naturally pointed teeth cannibals…!? This account locked for review…” Publishers of such could then say “AND we didn’t use AI! Serious. Try to get an AI to do this!? Not responsible if you get yourself banned to the point of your Google account being locked even trying!”
That Jones cover painting is prety bad too, certainly cutting corners.
How to write this without seeming ‘above it all’? I never knew Billy Graham did art for the digests but remembered him fondly for his Luke Cage and Black Panther work. As to the Klan storyline in Jungle action some additional information is offered. Don Mcgregor’s storyline continued in issue 22, skipped 23 (a Daredevil reprint which featured the Panther, then ended mid-plot in issue 24 cover dated November 1976. Jack Krby takes over with a new #1 (January 1977) through issue 12. Ed Hannigan takes over for the remaining three issue. Issue 15 (May 1979) begins to refer back to the interrupted Klan storyline and again the Panther is cancelled. Mavel Premiere #51 (December 1979) by Hannigan finally wraps up the storyline in three issues. I have often wondered how Mcgregor would have finished it but Hannigan did well under the circumstances. This was back in the days when Marvel would try to tie up loose ends – some of the time. Chris priest probably wrote the most well-rounded version of T-Challa but that’s a decision each reader can decide for themselves. submitted with respect for comic history written by the fan formerly known as Allard. I dropped that nickname years ago. it had served its purpose back in the day.