The (New) Crow – It’s a No From Me
Good afterevenmorn!
Well, it turns out that a new version of the film The Crow was released last week. Touted not as a remake of the 1994 gothic masterpiece, but a re-adaptation of the original graphic novel (I have my doubts), it nevertheless garnered quite negative reviews on release. As of the writing of this, it has a 20% on Rotten Tomatoes.
This was… predictable.
Before anyone runs at me with accusations… you’re probably correct. I didn’t go see the film for myself. Yes, I was and remain an enormous fan of the original adaptation. Its style and story have had a profound effect on me. And, yes, when I heard that it was being remade, I actually got a little upset. Of all the films primed to get a remake, this was not the one.
It’s not that I think that the 1994 release was the perfect film (though, it’s pretty close) and therefore untouchable. I just honestly thought (and still do) that The Crow is a work of art, with a very distinct comic style that served the story perfectly. I’m upset that Brandon Lee’s last film, the one he literally died while making, would be approached at all (granted, I’m aware that this irrational protectionism for the memory of someone I have never met is a little weird. You’ll have to forgive me).
I’m also annoyed that these older, already brilliant films are getting remakes at the expense of new stories. I’m so tired of the nostalgia porn, for lack of a better term. I’m desperate for new stories to be told (even if it’s new stories with familiar characters, like the new-ish Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance series that was, criminally, cancelled. It was so good. If I had unlimited funds, I’d pay to have it resurrected myself. I digress (I’m still furious it was cancelled)).
My nostalgia is for the 80s and early 90s, but not for the reason you think. It’s not the particular stories of these eras that I’m nostalgic for. I’m nostalgic for the eras when original works hit the screen; new stories that were likely quite risky, many of which didn’t work. Sure, some of them were real drug-fueled stinkers, but at least interesting things were done, particularly when it came to genre films. Taking such risks gave us Star Wars, for goodness sake. That’s what I’m nostalgic for.
Creativity has been bled out of our film industry.
I don’t think I would have minded the new The Crow if they weren’t rehashing the same story. If it was another thing that drew Eric Draven from the grave, a different wrong to right, than the exact same story as the 1994 adaptation. Or perhaps if they had changed the medium a bit; created not a live-action, but a R-rated animation. That might have been interesting. I might have spared more grace for something like that.
The original 1994 adaptation was a masterclass in lighting, mood, shadow and setting. The use of shadow alone was very plainly an inspiration for future superhero adaptations (I’m looking at you, Batman), as well as other movies. Hell, the show-down in the church, I realized recently, directly inspired a similar scene I wrote in Human. And I wasn’t even aware of that influence until I saw the scene again when I stumbled on a recent reaction to the film. It was film with incredible style.
There was absolutely no need to remake it.
I have to point out that I’m not as much of a purist as I probably come across here. Adaptations are more than alright. I love seeing a favourite book or short story or (now) video game made real on the screen (provided that it’s done right. Even if not, I will usually go see it for myself). Remakes are more than alright if they bring something new or improve upon what came before. I enjoyed the live-action adaptations of the Transformers and X-Men franchises (for the most part), even though they weren’t the best films ever… With the exception of Logan. That movie is a masterpiece and I will brook no dissent on the matter.
The Crow did neither of these, from what I’ve read and seen. It was the same story, but with a different colour-palette. That is not enough to warrant a remake, in my opinion.
In my cynicism, I imagine that studio executives acknowledged the cult status of the original film, saw that it was very popular amongst the generation famous for gobbling up whatever scraps of our happiest memories we can get, and guessed that a remake would draw all the original fans to the cinema, without taking the time to understand why the movie is so beloved. Style had a great deal to do with it. They were looking to cash in on the nostalgia that has been plaguing the entailment industry these last few years.
I don’t blame these studios entirely. They’re a business. They’re in it to make money. They are not, sadly, all that concerned with craft, art or story. Their primary concern is not to present an incredible story well told, but what will bring them the greatest return on their investment. I think that’s why I gravitate towards video games now more than films for my visual entertainment. Original, visually stunning, well-crafted and deeply affecting original stories are finding homes in game studios, not movie or television productions. I really needed to stress ‘original.’
Some of the blame for this rests on us, because we, the consumers, have often shunned interesting and new stories for the familiar, even if the familiar lacks any artistry whatsoever. Studios are terrified of taking risks, because we simply don’t buy tickets for original works in great enough numbers to warrant that risk, from a business perspective.
That, and there remains a pervasive bias against specifically science-fiction and fantasy genre in film-making (horror is out there living its best life, I see), so, despite the obvious demand for it, fewer original stories in those genres are likely to be green-lit (specifically for adults, I should note. There’s plenty out there for the young ones). That’s a topic for a whole ‘nother day.
I will not be going to see the new The Crow. I don’t want to. But I do miss it. So instead I’ll pop in my DVD, grab some popcorn and revel in the distinctly 90s soundtrack while one of my favourite anti-heroes stylishly metes out justice in an moody, raining city against those who wronged him and his beloved.
And I’ll make a wish that film studios will once again let people’s imaginations stretch. Who knows what stories we might be able to get to see in the future if they would just take a risk?
When S.M. Carrière isn’t brutally killing your favorite characters, she spends her time teaching martial arts, live streaming video games, and cuddling her cat. In other words, she spends her time teaching others to kill, streaming her digital kills, and a cuddling furry murderer. Her most recent titles include Daughters of Britain, Skylark and Human. Her serial The New Haven Incident is free and goes up every Friday on her blog.
I agree. Why is Hollywood so fixed on remakes and endless series that just get weaker. I look at my book shelves and see all the movies that could be made but are not. Time to be brave and not give us the film version of comfort food but taking a chance especially if the right writers can be found.
It feels terribly self-serving to want more book adaptations, but, yes, actually. There are so many brilliant stories out there that would be amazing to see on screen.
Given that horror and superhero-fantasy are in the movies right now, given that “The Witcher” and “Murderbot” are now on small screen, and given that the studios are remaking movies like “The Crow”… the most likely fresh story to be able to make the jump from book to silver screen would be Garth Nix’ “Sabriel.” There are so many adult threads behind the sort-of-YA themes in that book that it would make a good bridge into a renewed high fantasy wave for upper ages.
I’m sorry to hear that the remaking of “The Crow” has been such a disappointment. Hopefully they start to do a bit better.
I have heard excellent things about Sabriel.
Completely agree with you. I read a spoiler free plot summary of the new movie before it opened and it just confirmed this was an absolute nope for me. I was already leery based on the look of the new adaptation but discovering that for a good portion of the move Eric isn’t even the Crow and if focuses more on the relationshi8p between him and Shelly told me the creators of this version didn’t understand the source material.
Yes, we do need to see some scenes showing Eric and Shelly’s love for each other but it’s not a huge part of the story. The Crow is a supernatural revenge tale. The focus should be on Eric and his pain and desire for revenge while not becoming a rage-filled monster and using his abilities to do some good in the world while pursuing only those responsible for the heinous crimes done against him and Shelly.
I guess this is just a long winded way of saying Old Crow good, New Crow bad.
lol. Agreed.
There was a good piece in “Deadline” the other day about why these sequels keep bombing and why they keep getting made. In short, the fanbase sees the original as something very special and have a strong sentimental attachment to it. They very much want it left alone and as a group have no interest in any sequels. Hollywood, blindly clinging to the dubious idea that all IP can be milked endlessly, keeps churning them out in total denial of their repeated failure (there’s also a big chunk of big, greedy studio executive egotism involved).
https://deadline.com/2024/08/box-office-the-crow-bombs-analysis-1236050350/
I figured that was the case. It tracks.
No more remakes. Serious – anyone read Jack Womack’s “Random acts of senseless violence”? This is that book coming true but don’t reality TRUMP fiction!? In the book it was an eternal Great Depression 2.0 with America sliding to h— and the entertainment industry re-released to fanfare old movies and sold on new digital formats whole weeks of tv shows, commercials, complete runs of series..terrified to make anything new…. And it was written off for that alone. The Great Depression was a boom age for hollywood… But again reality TRUMPS fiction in this now that is much like Womac’s novel it’s bad and worse and crazier. The studios are terrified of risking $ on new products so they spend ten times the amount of the original to release a bland knockoff and they keep doing it again and again. Obviously they are bailed out by the Govern-NOT and short-selling stocks, etc. but people aren’t watching these anymore. And YouTube has long hours of commercials alone, DVD box sets sell and are collectables, there are whole genres based on this such as Vaporwave and the Backrooms – the psychic shock of America’s slow death… But the movies that are re-makes, sequels, etc. are NOT selling and people just don’t comment for trolls and fake accounts or bots to insult them they just don’t buy them.
And that’s me – I’m not doing any more long rants “They ruined my childhood memory…” ect.
Just not going to watch, buy, even CLICK or illegal download. Any ‘politics’ I write and encourage others to write to our Congress/Senate officials to demand ZERO bailouts for these huge companies and also antitrust actions. We don’t need to EAT “The Crow” (heh double entendre…) so we should not have to PAY for it with our tax $ if it doesn’t sell.